A Letter

Here is a letter sent to a friend which contains a letter I sent to a faculty member at the university where I am currently “stationed” as a PhD student. This is at a point during my “negotiation” process in determining possibilities for the direction of my research/dissertation, where I begin to shift toward a study of Keylontic Science from a “visual culture” standpoint. Previous to this, as can be seen in the original posting here, I had been considering making a study of ufology and abduction experiences/extraterrestrials, also from a visual culture standpoint.

Hey —– Here’s a letter I sent to one of the faculty here, a guy who has agreed to co-chair my dissertation committee, thought you might find it kinda interesting- since there are no published academic writings on Keylontic Science, I am having to incorporate other disciplines… I am going to inquire with the ————— as to whether I can do some type of internship – this is an option according to the PhD handbook for the art dept. here…

Hi Dr. ——-

I met with Dr. —– yesterday to see what he thought about my interest in a more narrowed scope of direction, which involves the visual culture of Keylontic Science. He had been under the impression that I was going to make a study of visual cultures of the paranormal, and advised me that it is not a good thing to become characterized as one who changes his mind regarding the direction of the PhD. I did however, get assent from Dr. —– that whichever path I choose, I should stay with it.

I should also say that with regard to Dr. —–, the idea of pursuing a visual culture study of the paranormal was simply a conversation we had been having, after I advised him that I was not going to follow Dr. ——‘ suggestion that I do a visual culture study of Roswell. It has been my understanding that I never “officially declared” any specific course of research, while all along, my research outside of required coursework has been within the fields of the “extraterrestrial question,” visual culture, and Keylontic science in particular, all of which include elements of the “paranormal.”

I haven’t mentioned this to anyone else at TTU, but as of today I became a team member of an emerging community whose focus is to bring systems of knowledge, much of which many might deem “theoretical metaphysics,” out into the global community. At this point I am unable to discuss the particulars due to a confidentiality/non-disclosure agreement, but the work there will tie in very nicely with the PhD project as I envision it currently. I’m thinking it would be very worthwhile if I could follow the internship path for my dissertation along with this organization, or maybe as a professional problem. On the other hand, for the cultural study aspect, it might be better to remain entirely neutral…

My concern is in finding academic sources which would lend themselves to my dissertation focus, which revolves around keylontic science, but which I am hoping can be more focused on the way that various cultures might apprehend the teachings of keylontic science. In other words, as I think about forming a prototype for my dissertation proposal, I’m looking for ideas for sources within the academic field which can inform ways that various cultures (from a visual culture perspective) would interface with a true unified field theory which is by necessity steeped in areas today referred to as metaphysical. With the advent of things like quantum science, the electric universe theory, multidimensionality, parallel universe theory, etc., lines between physics and metaphysics are becoming blurred.

My interest is in what might be described as cultural theory. It’s probably a post-humanity type of study, in that it has to encompass a wider field than many paradigms allow. I think you mentioned philosophers as being potential committee candidates also, and this is in line with what Dr. ——- has mentioned. Theoretically, a cultural reconciliation of something like keylontic science will have to address paranormal, religious, humanistic, scientific, shamanic, and other types of culture. Here’s a brief definition of Keylontic Science:

Keylontic Science encompasses, among many other things, the following (links don’t work, I just copied the text):
The Anatomy of Cosmic Structure.
Energy and Time Matrices and Morphogenetic Energy Fields
The Structure of Multi-dimensional Human Anatomy
Personal Identity Levels, our Crystal Body and Silicate Gene(DNA) Matrix
The Science and Process of Dimensional Ascension and Bio-spiritual Evolution.
Techniques for Healing, Protection and Accelerating Biological and Spiritual Evolution.
I apologize for the long email, I’m struggling a bit in delineating my path forward, and in formulating the right questions. There are certainly a wide variety of academic resources when it comes to quantum science, exobiology, shamanism, comparative religions, ancient texts (the Mahabharata of India for instance is described by some as early translations of Keylonta), metaphysics & philosophy, etc. Perhaps these would be the best types of sources to use, reconciling them with Keylontic science, as taken together they certainly all contain aspects of visual culture. This allows me to keep things within the correct paradigm of the academic institution. I have access to many thousands of pages of writings on Keylontic Science, alas, none are published by academic institutions or academic publishers (at least not yet!).

I am hoping that part of my research can also include the development of visual work, since this type of work requires ways to help people visualize some of the complex subject matter. Does this make sense, or am I sounding like a crazy man, lol? It seems like very relevant and worthwhile work, and ultimately I believe it can lead to a lot of new knowledge and publishable material.

Mainly, I just wanted to see if you have ideas for sources I can use which are more directly tied to culture/visual culture, among these various areas.

I have not asked anyone else yet, as far as who might be interested in being a co-chaiperson, feel free to let me know if there is someone who you think would be interested. Also, I’m just starting to look around to find possible committee people from other departments, and will likely soon be asking someone from one of the other departments to write my core exam question.

I re-submitted my requests to Dr. —– for course transfers from other institution(s), I believe if two of them are approved I can finish my coursework next Fall, and begin working on the dissertation. I would appreciate any thoughts or suggestions you may have about any of this,

Best regards,
Greg D.


The Elites

I’m somewhat unclear as to the nature of those commonly referred to as the ‘elites.’ John Lear and others state that there are people living on all of the planets, along with the moon, our spaceship companion. On one hand, elements of our government are considered to be ‘elitists’, maintained as separate groups by bloodlines. On the other hand if there are separately maintained secret and highly advanced space programs, illuminatist and masonic elements in the entertainment and business sectors, and other of these ‘elites’ in the scientific and religious communities, a significantly large group or groups of people on our planet must be ‘elites.’ The term ‘elite’ is somewhat divisive when used in the context of secrecy. There is an implied “we are superior to you” us/them mentality, along with the possibility that maybe it isn’t really desirable to join the “elitists,” because you would then be participating in that arrogance.

The Nazca Plains and the Shamans

Listening to George Noory interviewing William Buhlman about out of body experiences is compelling in many ways, but I found that a certain portion of it was closely related to the extra terrestrial field of study. Mr. Buhlman is becoming known as the leading expert on inter-dimensional travel, and has spent some time with shamans in Western South America. Peruvian shamans explained to Mr.Buhlman that as part of an initiation training for shamans, the lines at Nazca were used in conjunction with psychedelic plants. This explanation was given to Buhlman by two older and well-respected shamans. All of the Nazca figures have small circles somewhere on them, and during initiation ceremonies after inductions of Ahuyuasca or other psychedelic plants, the initiates were required to rise up out of their bodies and into the sky, and identify the animal where their body was seated. Once they had done this, they were considered true shamans.



I was involved in a conversation regarding faster than light travel a few days ago, and of course Einstein’s theories came up, along with the news from the Hadron collider. Again it was thought that faster than light movement of subatomic particles had occurred, and again it was stated that it wasn’t true after all because of faulty measurements. All of this from news media, which is dubious at best. Einstein’s theory of relativity states that faster than light travel is not possible. Maybe so and maybe not, but if in fact extraterrestrials have come here from numerous locations, certainly they have travelled faster than light. Have they found a way to travel by injecting themselves into less physical dimensions of space time? There are an enormous variety of vehicles seen by abductees and other people. It doesn’t seem likely that with all of the hundreds or thousands of vehicular shapes and configurations seen by people that they all come from different places. Perhaps the huge variety of vehicle types is a way of obfuscating their true nature- they all look different to confuse us. Another possibility is that in a culture that is sufficiently advanced and creative, or at least creative in some way, various travelers might be able to design or choose the shape of the vehicle they travel in. This could be especially easy if they are working in a less physical vibratory level of the multiverse. Sometimes I think that maybe certain beings are able to shape shift the vehicles they travel in at will- likely through a type of technology which appropriates more subtle energies of the universe which we have not yet learned how to use, at least outside of our own mind/body/soul/spirit. Perhaps this technology only exists outside of some of the visitors. As humans, we are capable of astral projection. For them, perhaps a utilization of some kind of technology is required. This would mean that as beings we are more intrinsically powerful than they are, yet in some ways subject to their advanced technologies. It has been coming into view for me of late that there are indeed some entities which have found ways to exercise a large amount of control over humans of low spiritual integrity, or who have somehow impersonated humans. With the continued destruction of our planet, the question arises as to whether it is simply dumb human momentum at work or a more sinister force.

Nasci Fidelitas

The title of this blog means “developing fidelity.” The words chosen are Latin in origin.

The purpose here is to discuss visual records of abduction experiences provided by abductees in the form of drawings and/or paintings.

This is for research purposes, and is designed as a discreet forum, that ultimately will inform a PhD dissertation on the subject. This dissertation will be focused on the visual aspects, cosmologic significance, and implications for contemporary society which the artworks may present vis-a-vis a variety of subjective human dimensions and experience.

The forum here is not designed to be exploitive or to sensationalize any of the information in any way.

Please inform me/us if you feel that you may have experiences and documentation of those experiences in the form of your own artwork, which may contribute meaningfully to a research project such as this; feel free as well to contribute to the discussion here via comments. As long as your comments are based on sincerity and a desire for knowledge rather than on more pedestrian agendas and arguments, they will be appreciated. It is not the purpose of this blog to publish artwork, though this may occur if certain members wish for their work to be seen online by others. The main impulse here is toward discussions which can be informative and valuable for those involved and for the overall research project, NOT to generate, solicitate, or syndicate other kinds of publicity or popularity.